4 years campaigning for a stronger Royal Navy, the story so far & the way ahead…
Background
My ‘day job’ is a web designer and as I looked around online there seemed to be few independent voices on the web talking about the state of the RN other than a few forums mainly inhabited by experts and defence professionals. It seemed that there was an obvious need for an independent voice highlighting the situation in layman’s terms and trying to engage the wider public. Launched in 2007, Save the Royal Navy is a website (not an organisation) campaigning to reverse the decline in the RN aiming to educate about Britain’s need for a strong navy. Written in an accessible style, the site aims to engage the general public not just the naval expert. There are 2 main themes: 1. to highlight the good work, achievements and importance of what is being done by the RN today, despite its dilapidated condition while countering the government spin that claims everything is ‘just fine’ despite the massive cuts. 2. To push for the RN to be properly funded and for the cuts to be reversed (and this will only happen if there is significant public and media pressure on our complacent politicians).
Initially it was hoped the site would attract regular contributors and grow as a community as it was never intended it to just be a personal or vanity project, rather a ‘hub’ for naval campaigners. It didn’t quite happen that way (more on the ‘community’ later). There have been a few other contributors but the site is essentially run on a shoestring in very limited spare time. Visitor numbers to the site have always been relatively small (unfortunately this is very much an obscure subject for most people) but continue to grow steadily and number several thousand per month. However the site has gained a certain authority and there’s regular contact from journalists researching the RN. The site also receives many positive emails, interesting and sometimes bizarre suggestions and occasional donations. However it is the Twitter feed (www.twitter.com/NavyLookout) that has really taken off in the last 18 months and this is where most effort is now devoted. Tweeting a mix of general RN news and comment with (currently around 1500 followers and rising daily), most of the tweets get re-tweeted so the number of people being kept informed on a daily basis and taking an interest in the RN is growing exponentially.
What future for the RN?
It’s hard to be really optimistic about the RN’s future as successive governments have always reduced the RN’s size and we are heading for a tiny fleet of very expensive vessels so there really is nothing left to cut or ‘trim’ without massive loss of capability which would reduce the RN to a coastal force or a minor US/European ally. Whether 1 or both the aircraft carriers will actually make it into service with a fully functional fixed-wing air group remains to be seen, (there is still plenty of time for politicians to screw it up further). The Type 26 programme is also pretty critical to the shape of the future fleet and it will be interesting to see if the trend of ever-more expensive and complex vessels can be broken so the cost can be kept down and a decent number of ships get built. However by going for top quality warships such as the large carriers, Astutes and Type 45s, the RN should soon have some of the best naval assets in the world, if very few in number (when the many ‘teething problems’ are finally resolved). What we can be sure of it that we should “expect the unexpected” In the next 10 years governments will find they want to place more demands on the RN than it can possibly meet. (In fact the current government, after the recent ill-advised naval cuts, has already found it now has limited options to intervene in Libya.) Sadly it will probably require a significant armed conflict or even military defeat before our forces are funded properly. Ironically defence is the easiest target for cuts from a political perspective as the public simply doesn’t know or care enough about what is going on to make much of an outcry. The more preferable alternative would be to raise public and media awareness of the situation that would create political pressure to make politicians fund the RN properly.
The naval campaigning scene
The community of campaigners trying to promote the RN are currently small, rather splintered and have achieved very little. The task of changing public and government attitudes to the RN is a huge task. To have any hope of being an effective lobby will require people to work together with concerted and focused action. The fiercely tri-service approach of UKNDA (who’s campaigning efforts I mainly applaud) has achieved some recognition in media and political circles and is having a small impact although internal struggles and funding problems seem to have limited its progress. The ‘services united’ approach to campaigning is superficially appealing and avoids sometimes painful and destructive inter-service rivalry, but it takes the position that the defence ‘pie’ should just be bigger but remain divided into roughly the same sized 3 slices. It does not look at the overall needs of UK defence. Something is clearly wrong when despite the UK being an island nation who’s defence has historically rested with the RN, global sea trade being more important than ever and most of the world’s population living in coastal areas, the RN receives the smallest slice of the shrinking defence budget!
The RN is also rather backward in coming forward when it comes to PR and rather ineffective when fighting for proper funding. While the culture of modesty, sang-froid, understatement and a ‘can do’ attitude are great assets in naval combat and operations, this way of doing things can be a hindrance when dealing with government and media. The RAF has a powerful and organised PR machine and maintains a high visibility to the public with the Red Arrows looping the loop all over the UK, together with the enduring ‘Battle of Britain myth’ that suggests the RAF won the war single-handed. Understandably the Army currently has a good deal of media’s attention and the nation’s support with its operations in Afghanistan. Meanwhile the RN is largely out of sight and out of mind with much of it’s best work done over the horizon. The RN could improve its own PR but of course is powerless to resist the cuts to its budget as it obviously can’t make open criticisms of is political masters. Only independent bodies can put the case for the RN is clear terms and be outspoken, honest and take on the political fight.
Blueprint for a single voice?
I would broadly support the proposal for the creation “Naval institute” or some kind of umbrella organisation of some kind to co-ordinate the efforts of all those concerned about the state of the RN. I would suggest its main aim would be to campaign for a stronger RN but it could also have other arms that could cover academic study and possibly co-ordinate the various naval welfare and charity groups. The institute would need some funding but at least initially could be run quite inexpensively as a collection of individuals who communicate primarily online and could avoid costly premises, full time employees etc.
To be truly effective the campaigning work needs to be:
1. Blunt, accurate and timely.
When needed use honest and clear language to raise the alarm about government cuts and under-funding counter mis-information from other services to highlight the damage being done to the RN.
2. Engaging everyone.
Communication needs to be in layman’s terms, avoiding excessive use of acronyms and jargon and giving clear explanation in understandable terms. Ideally the style would be witty and straightforward, avoiding over-wordy ‘broadsides’. Unfortunately the UKNDA was sometimes perceived as a ‘club for Ruperts‘ – ie something just for senior officers and any new campaign must not fall into that trap. Stiff letters to the Daily Telegraph and lengthy ‘papers’ by retired Admirals are not the only way forward. Media friendly and more ‘tabloid’ and less ‘broadsheet’ is what is needed so anyone can engage and immediately understand the debate.
3. Exploiting social media
With the rise in social media and web communication, clever exploitation of the web can be both inexpensive and very effective and should be the main focus of campaign efforts initially. Powerful visuals, info-graphics and video could all be used to get the message across in a simple and understandable way. The aim would be to make the Institute’s web site and its social media feeds THE independent authority on RN issues for public and media and provide timely comment and analysis of current events.
So can the naval community work together to bring our politicians to account? I would happily let savetheroyalnavy.org be taken over or absorbed into a new umbrella organisation’ and co-operate with anyone who can get the message out there and be more effective. I would challenge all interested parties to get in touch, get involved, put aside private agendas and see what we can do together in the defence of the Royal Navy.
Related articles
- Letters: Tornado whips up defence rethink (guardian.co.uk)
- The Royal Navy Wants Its Carriers Back (defensetech.org)
- Armed forces face radical changes under Lord Levene plans (guardian.co.uk)

10 reasons why the state of the Royal Navy should matter to YOU
1. Protecting ships that carry the food you eat, the stuff you buy and the fuel you need.

Most of the oil used by the UK arrives by sea.
Global maritime trade relies on the free and lawful use of the sea. The UK is an island nation and most of the food and goods you buy in the shops has arrived from overseas on a ship. The same goes for the oil that powers your car (and just about every kind of transport in the country) has arrived in vast, vulnerable oil tankers. Even a slight disruption to this flow of oil would case massive problems for the UK, just remember the serious effects of the short-lived fuel protest of 2000. A large tanker, the Sirius Star carrying $100 million worth of crude oil was seized by pirates in 2008demonstrating how vulnerable they are and how itcould impact world markets. Without fuel, food distribution would quickly grind to a halt, rationing would be introduced and we would have to rely on meagre locally grown supplies. By 2011, 50% of the gas that you heat your house and cook with will arrive by sea from abroad (aboard the even more vulnerable ‘floating bombs’ that are Liquid Natural Gas carriers). 92% of UK trade by volume (586 million tonnes) is moved by sea. The health of the already fragile UK economy depends on this. Your job may well depend directly or indirectly on the free flow of imports or exports by sea. Sea transport is a significant part of the economy and is the UK’s 3rd largest service sector. These ships are obviously vulnerable to attack by a foreign country, attack by terrorists and, as demonstrated by recent events, attack by pirates. The only effective way to protect merchant shipping is with naval forces. During 2 World wars in the 20th Century Britain came close to starvation because her merchant shipping was being sunk by submarines. Today there are fewer merchant ships but they’re generally much larger and in open conflict would make fat and easy targets for today’s sophisticated submarines. Just a few well-handled submarines could wreak havoc on world trade. 95% of global trade passes through just 9 narrow ‘choke points’ (such as the Straits of Hormuz ) where it is especially easy for a belligerent nation or even a terrorist group to attack shipping.The RN is particularly short of escort vessels needed to protect merchant shipping from submarine, air or missile attacks. The Tory government of the 1980s was committed to maintaining 50 frigates and destroyers (escorts). The current labour government has slashed the number of theses vessels to 21 and lack of orders means it will fall even further in the near future. (As an interesting comparison Japan, an island nation of similar size to the UK, although more populous and richer, but with far fewer global commitments operates around 50 escorts.)
2. Operating the nuclear deterrent that helps keeps the peace.
Whatever you think about nuclear weapons, it is hard to disagree with the fact that the threat of their use has prevented world war for over 60 years. The Royal Navy has quietly helped maintain this deterrent which ultimately helped win the Cold War. While unstable nations around the world continue to acquire nuclear weapons it would seem wise that Britain retains this ability. It would be great if the world was entirely rid of these horror weapons but that’s really an unlikely utopian fantasy. They are expensive to build and maintain but not as expensive as a world war. It does not bear thinking about how the effects of nuclear war would impact on the lives of every individual in almost every part of the world.The UK government is committed to replacing the current generation of nuclear-armed submarines although work needs to start urgently if there is not going to be a gap in capability. It is also pondering whether it can cut corners and build just 3 submarines instead of 4 that are needed to safely guarantee one on patrol at any one time. The recentcollision by one of the deterrent submarines and a French submarine demonstrates the need for some spare capacity in the event the unexpected. In addition to the actual RN submarines that carry these weapons, there is a need for trained and experienced personnel to man them and other submarines and ships to protect them at times. The RN is already short of these resources.
3. Helping in the fight against terrorism.
The causes of terrorism and what the reponses to it should be are complex and controversial. However what is not in doubt is that it is an increasing threat to the world and in most cases terrorists need to be confronted by force. Britain is second only to the US on the list of countries that insane Islamic militants want to target with indiscriminate murder and mayhem. Everyday, largely out of sight and out of the public mind, the RN is part of the complex array of forces trying to combat terrorism. Whether contributing personnel, and aircraft to Afghanistan, or conducting maritime search of suspect vessels, the RN is helping police the seas and disrupt terrorism. For more urgent action RN submarines carry very accurate long-range Tomahawk missiles which have been used in the past to target terrorist training camps.As with protecting trade, the RN simply does not have the number of ships needed to patrol the large areas used by terrorist traffic.
4. Maintaining British influence in the world.
The ships of the RN are a key component in projecting Britain’s influence. (whether this is for good or bad is of course dependent on the integrity of the incumbent government). Visiting RN vessels are a great way to promote relationships with friendly and neutral nations around the world. The size and ability of the RN (and other UK forces) is a significant factor in how much influence we have over global politics and in particular the actions of the United States. The presence of a warship can send a powerful message of deterrence without a shot being fired. The concept of a ‘fleet in being’ is a cornerstone in the defence of the UK and its interests. The knowledge that we possess a fleet and are able to use it can make potential aggressors think twice. For example, in could be argued that cuts in the RN fleet lead directly to the Falklands conflict. Argentina interpreted the weakening of the navy as a lack of resolve by the UK to protect its overseas assets.The tangible benefits for you as a UK citizens of this influence is both economic; helping UK business, and moral; UK values and UK people receive greater respect and attention abroad. The United Kingdom has 13 Overseas Territories and, in the last 15 years the RN has provided direct support to 6 of them. There are also 5.5 million Britons living overseas. The RN is the most important tool the UK possesses when diplomatic avenues are either exhausted or need backing with force.
5. Supplying humanitarian aid and helping with disaster relief around the world.
The RN not only trains for war but for humanitarian missions. Every year RN warships are involved in providing aid, comfort and relief of nations that have suffered natural disasters. In the Caribbean where islands are regularly devastated by hurricanes RN vessels have often been the first on the scene providing help to the local authorities. In the aftermath of the devastating tsunami in 2004, RN vessels went to the relief of Sri Lanka. There have been many other examples going back decades where trained men, well equipped ships and the ‘can-do’ attitude of the RN has been a huge help to struggling communities across the globe. On a smaller scale it is common practice for RN warships visiting foreign ports to send small teams to help local charities in various practical ways such a repairing an orphanage or decorating a school. In addition ship’s companies regularly raise considerable sums of money to donate to charitable organisations. In these kind of efforts the RN is a great ambassador for the UK and a force for good in the world.
6. Protecting UK waters and the fish stocks.

Fishing remains an important industry,
particularly in the more remote parts of the UK.
Fish are an important part of our diet and the fishing industry is a mainstay of many small ports around UK. Protecting fish stocks from over-fishing, preventing plunder by foreign vessels and enforcing fish quotas and regulations is actually the oldest task performed by the RN. In addition to fishery protection, supporting the Coastguard, Customs and Police in the fight against terrorism crime, drug smuggling, illegal immigration are occasional additional roles for RN vessels on your doorstep.With 10,500 miles of coastline and 600 ports one of the UK’s greatest natural resources is the sea. The current government has allowed the RN’s fishery protection fleet to fall to a laughable 3 vessels dedicated to patrolling UK waters.
7. Disrupting the flow of illegal drugs.
The RN regularly patrols in the Caribbean region and has made seizures of large amounts drugsgrown in South America intended for Europe. The RN has also sized drugs from suspect vesselsacross the worlds oceans. Disrupting the trade in narcotics that are a major cause of crime, mental health problems and misery on the streets near you is very worthwhile. Money from the sale of drugs is also a source of funds for terrorism and criminal empires. As the drug smugglers become more sophisticated, even building crude submarines to transport drugs, then a global response is needed and only the RN can contribute to this in partnership with local civilian agencies.
8. Carrying out search and rescue missions.

RN aircraft are on standby to perform
rescue missions around the UK 24 hours a day.
Many mariners, climbers and holidaymakers owe their lives to the Royal Navy. RN and RAF helicopters provide search, rescue and urgent transport to those in danger or injured, usually at sea or on around the coastline of the UK. Many RN aircrew have received bravery awards for risking their lives to save others in hazardous conditions. In addition, RN ships and aircraft regularly go to aid of sailors in danger across the oceans whenever they are in a position to offer assistance.As a ‘cost saving measure’ the government plans to privatise search and rescue cover from 2012 and replace experienced RN and RAF crews with private contractors.
9. Supporting manufacturing, industry, research and science.
Designing, building and maintaining the vessels and equipment needed by the RN employs thousands of people in the UK and helps maintain cutting edge industrial skills which benefit the economy as a whole. Manufacturing is a key part of a good economy and we can’t just rely on the service sector. Although it is hard to argue the taxpayer has received good value for money recently as so many projects have been mis-managed and gone over-budget, never the less, these skills and capabilities are important to keep as no one knows when the UK may need to expand it’s forces to meet future threats.Through a lack of steady placing of equipment orders, this government is allowing much of the industrial infrastructure that supports the RN to wither and this valuable skills base, built up over decades is hard to re-build in a hurry, if at all. While generally trying to stimulate the troubled economy by public spending, no extra money has been given to defence projects.
10. Training and employing people.
The RN has approximately 35,000 people and it provides secure employment for them and many others indirectly supporting them. RN personnel are trained to a high standard and as their lives may depend on each other, develop an ethos of loyalty, discipline and teamwork which is often lacking in civilian life. When they leave the service they are attractive prospects to many employers and ex-forces personnel and generally a valuable labour resource for the economy. The RN teaches leadership, resourcefulness and teamwork, together with a certain under-statement and a ‘can-do’ attitude. The occasional mis-deeds of sailors get plenty of media coverage and obviously not all ex-RN personnel are paragons of virtue but in general the RN produces rounded individuals who contribute to society.Pressure on the RN to do too much with too few people means the average sailor is over-worked and not getting enough time in shore jobs. Regularly breaking their own ‘harmony’ guidelines, the government’s lack of investment in the service is leading to a vicious circle as experienced people resign, tired of too much time away from home serving on under-manned ships.
Related articles
- UK’s top admiral faces world of new demands with an austerity fleet (guardian.co.uk)

Recent Posts
- The shape of things to come – video of F35B on trials
- The morning after the night before… Making the best of ‘Plan B’
- Government U-turn on carriers means less capability and long-term costs
- Useful web links about the looming decision on aircraft carriers ‘cats and traps’ and F35B or C
- Failure of political strategy, lack of vision and poor planning leaves the aircraft carrier project facing more problems
- Good news on Royal Fleet Auxiliary tankers lost in controversy
- HMS Dauntless’ routine deployment underlines Britain’s right to defend the Falkland Islands

